Amina A. Soliman v. Ebasco Services Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “independent of his client, an attorney has no personal right to an award of statutory attorney’s fees” pursuant to a civil rights statute which allowed for prevailing party fees
• finding attorney’s belief that client’s sanctions claim belonged to him to be “thoroughly mistaken”
• where appeal brought by attorney over client’s statement that it was without permission, sanctions were appropriate
• “[I]ndependent of his client, an attorney has no personal right to an award of statutory attorney’s fees under [Title VII].”
• “When a [material action] is [taken] without the client’s authorization and, in 3 Alix v. McKinsey & Co., 470 F. Supp. 3d 310, 317 (S.D.N.Y. 2020) (“A stipulation of dismissal filed under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) or (ii

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).