Amhil Enterprises Ltd. v. Wawa, Inc., Dba Wawa Food Market, and M & N Plastics, Inc. And Ivonis Mazzarolo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that summary judgment is only proper for infringement cases when there is no genuine issue of material fact and no expert testimony is required
• summary judgment of no literal infringement affirmed under the clearly erroneous standard of review
• “A reply brief, which should ‘reply to the brief of the appellee,’ is 7 not the appropriate place to raise, for the first time, an issue[.]” (citation omitted)
• “Literal infringement of a claim exists when every limitation recited in 14 the claim is found in the accused device, i.e., when the properly construed claim reads on 15 the accused device exactly.”
• “Literal infringement of a claim exists when every limitation recited in the claim is 20 found in the accused device, i.e., when the properly construed claim reads on the accused 21 device exactly.”
• “A reply brief, which should ‘reply to the brief of the appellee,’ see Fed. R. App. P. 28(c), is not the appropriate place to raise, for the first time, an issue for appellate review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).