AMG Industries, Inc. v. A.J. Eckert Co.
Citations
- 279 A.D.2d 717
- 719 N.Y.S.2d 192
- 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 279
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the bank possessed a “duly executed and perfected security interest in plaintiffs current and after-acquired equipment, inventory, accounts receivable, contract rights and general intangibles”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Buchwald v. Di Lido Beach Resort, Ltd. (In Re McCann, Inc.)S.D. New York· 2004-12-28· cited 8×
- Kemper Insurance Companies v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2009-12-31· cited 8×
- Pu v. GrubinS.D. New York· 2012-12-19· cited 7×
- RAD & D'Aprile Inc. v. Arnell Construction Corp.New York Supreme Court· 2015-06-05
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Aquilino v. United StatesNew York Court of Appeals· 1961-07-07· cited 68×
- Frontier Excavating, Inc. v. Sovereign Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1968-10-31· cited 25×
- Niagara Venture v. Sicoli & Massaro, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1990-12-27· cited 22×
- Winner v. CuomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1992-02-13· cited 19×
- City of New York v. Cross Bay Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 1999-02-23· cited 16×
- Frontier Excavating, Inc. v. Sovereign Constr. Co., Ltd. of New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals· 1969-05-15· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.