Amf, Incorporated v. McDonald Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where prototype had never performed satisfactorily and evidence existed that seller was not actively working on project, buyer had reasonable grounds for insecurity
• noting that Seventh Circuit had previously rejected “a formalistic approach” and waiving the writing requirement where the party on whom a demand for assurance was made knew that it had been made
• \Whether in a specific case a buyer has reasonable grounds for insecurity is a question of fact.\
• “Whether in a spe‐ cific case a buyer has reasonable grounds for insecurity is a question of fact.”
• “Whether in a spe‐ cific case a buyer has reasonable grounds for insecurity is a question of fact.”
• where seller continued to push back delivery projections, buyer had reasonable grounds for insecurity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).