Ametco, Ltd. v. Beltchev

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that right of first refusal was not “expressly reaffirmed” in month-to-month tenancy because “plaintiffs actions were inconsistent with its present contention that the right of first refusal survived the expiration of the lease”
• “Like the plaintiff in White Castle, Coinmach’s actions in this case were consistent with a waiver of the contractual right of first refusal, which it did not attempt to assert until August 23, 2002, over a year after the parties’ lease had expired.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).