Amet v. Boyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that while the ALJ should consider the opinion of a nurse practitioner in the analysis as an “other source” opinion, the ALJ was not required to give said opinion controlling weight
• “Although treating physicians may share their opinions concerning a patient’s inability to work and the severity of the disability, the ultimate decision of whether an individual is disabled is ‘reserved to the Commissioner.’” (citing 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527(d)(1
• “Where an ALJ fails to note a particular impairment at step two, if the ALJ finds other severe impairments and considers the omitted impairment in the subsequent steps, ‘any error was harmless.’” (quoting O’Connell v. Colvin, 558 F. App’x 63, 65 (2d Cir. 2014))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).