Skip to main content
· 9/14/1993

Ames v. City of Fircrest

Citations

  • 857 P.2d 1083
  • 71 Wash. App. 284
  • 1993 Wash. App. LEXIS 373

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “Ames had the burden, both as the party claiming the exemption from disclosure and as the responding nonmovant at summary judgment, to present evidence sufficient to establish a prima facie case that nondisclosure was essential to effec tive law enforcement”
  • appellate review of PRA decisions based solely on documentary evidence without testimony is de novo, and the appellate court may decide issues of both fact and law
  • “The plurality holding in Cowles is case specific and does not establish a broad principle that all information in the records of any investigation characterized as an internal investigation is automatically exempt.”
  • \The plurality holding in Cowles is case specific and does not establish a broad principle that all information in the records of any investigation characterized as an internal investigation is automatically exempt.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seinfeld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.