Ames Body Corp. v. Ralph

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an interpretation is “not reasonable if it strains the policy language ‘beyond its reasonable and ordinary meaning’ ”
• observing that “insurance policies are interpreted according to general rules of contract interpretation” under New York law,” and that “summary judgment on the meaning of an insurance policy is appropriate when the terms of a policy are unambiguous”
• “Georgia appellate courts have not yet addressed the issue of allocation of liability in a progressive injury case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).