Amerson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \OCGA § 24-3-16 requires only that the child be available to testify; it does not require the child to corroborate the hearsay testimony\
• evidence sufficient to sustain molestation conviction; although victim refused to speak, forensic interview was admitted into evidence
• evidence sufficient to sustain molestation conviction; although victim refused to speak, forensic interview was admitted into evidence
• “OCGA § 24-3-16 requires only that the child be available to testify; it does not require the child to corroborate the hearsay testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Westbrooks v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-04-21· cited 36×
• Leaptrot v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-03-30· cited 22×
• Kirkland v. the State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-10-06· cited 21×
• Newton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-02-27· cited 20×
• Maurer v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-03-21· cited 18×
• Hilliard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-06-23· cited 16×
• Manders v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-10-05· cited 11×
• Harvey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-01-07· cited 8×
• McIntyre v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-03-10· cited 6×
• Simpson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-11-17· cited 3×
• David Maurer v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-03-21

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gregg v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-09-05· cited 141×
• Kapua v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-08-05· cited 50×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-06-19· cited 9×