Amerlux Steel Products Corp. v. M/V Houffalize

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the court concluded that the Rule 55(b)(2)’s hearing requirement was satisfied based on the complaint and accompanying affidavit and it was unnecessary to proceed with a more formal evidentiary hearing.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).