Amerkan v. Missier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “strict application of the bright line rule in [Commonwealth v. Lord, 719 A.2d 306 (Pa. 1990),] necessitates strict interpretation of the rules regarding notice of Rule 1925(b
• holding that a parent's love of her child, alone, does not preclude a termination
• holding that a parent’s love of her child, alone, does not preclude a termination
• holding that the “strict application of the bright line rule in [Commonwealth v. Lord, 553 Pa. 415, 719 A.2d 306 (1990),] necessitates strict interpretation of the rules regarding notice of Rule 1925(b) orders.”
• stating that the analysis under section 2511(b) requires a \determination of the needs and welfare of the child under the standard of best interests. . . .\
• holding, “strict application of the bright-line rule [of Rule 1925 waiver] necessitates strict interpretation of the rules regarding notice of Rule 1925(b) orders.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).