Skip to main content
· 7/13/2000

Ameritech Benefit Plan Committee v. Communication Workers of America, Annette Foster-Hall, and Bernadette Bernabei v. Ameritech Corporation

Citations

  • 220 F.3d 814
  • 24 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2490
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 16043
  • 79 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,232
  • 83 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 794

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the “employees cannot show the kind of intentional discrimination that would trigger the exception to the statutory protection afforded to seniority systems”
  • holding that the “employees cannot show the kind of intentional discrimination that would trigger the exception to the statutory protection afforded to seniority systems”
  • recognizing that the PDA has not been treated as retroactive
  • recognizing that the PDA has not been treated as retroac- tive
  • holding claim of pre-Act pregnancy discrimination time-barred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Ripple, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.