Amerisure, Inc. v. Wurster Const. Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that faulty workmanship is not an accident and therefore not an occurrence
• noting that Indiana “case law in this area is limited,” and examining whether workmanship can constitute an occurrence in a commercial general liability policy.
• “[Consistent with ... R.N. Thompson as well as the majority of jurisdictions outside our state, we hold that defective workmanship that results in damages only to the work product itself is not an occurrence.”
• “[C]onsistent with . . . R.N. Thompson as well as the majority of jurisdictions outside our state, we hold that defective workmanship that results in damages only to the work product itself is not an occurrence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).