Amerijet International, Inc. v. John Pistole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• referring to the requirement that an agency adequately explain its decision as a “basic principle” that is “indis pensable to sound judicial review”
• noting that remand is the “usual remedy”
• “[C]onclusory statements will not do; an agency’s statement must be one of reasoning.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• \[C]onclusory statements will not do; an agency's statement must be one of reasoning. \
• “[A] fundamental requirement of administrative law is that an agency set forth its reasons for decision; an agency’s failure to do so constitutes arbitrary and capricious agency action.”
• “[A]n agency must explain ‘why it chose to do what it did.’ And to this end, conclusory statements will not do; an ‘agency’s statement must be one of reasoning.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).