America's Health Insurance Plans v. Ralph Hudgens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• withholding ultimate determination of whether law was \saved\ by ERISA's savings clause as unnecessary because the deemer clause applied to preempt the self- funded plan
• “[I]n this model, it [is] . . . the employer . . . that endures the financial risk associated with being responsible for paying health care charges incurred by its employees.”
• explaining the difference between insured and self-funded ERISA plans
• challenging state insurance law was preempted by ERISA
• describing irreparable harm as an “equitable factor[]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).