America's Favorite Chicken Co. v. Samaras

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming jury’s damage award presumably based on challenges by defendant’s expert to plaintiffs expert damage model
• “Where conflicting evidence is presented, we are not called upon to reweigh the evidence; thus, the jury’s verdict on such matters is generally considered to be conclusive.”
• current version at Tex Fin.Code Ann. §§ 304.102, 104 (Vernon 1998)
• “Where the evidence shows that the parties intended to enter into an agreement, the courts should find the contract to be definite enough to grant a remedy provided that there is a certain basis for determining the remedy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).