E.D. Pennsylvania· 11/14/2006
AmericanAnglian Environmental Technologies, L.P. v. Doherty
Citations
- 461 F. Supp. 2d 359
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83062
- 2006 WL 3327668
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the argument that Rule 69 required the court to apply Pennsylvania venue rules in an action to enforce a judgment and applying 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a
- rejecting the argument that Rule 69 required the court to apply Pennsylvania venue rules in an action to enforce a judgment and applying 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bartle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyThird Circuit· 1995-06-02· cited 1,215×
- Ferens v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court· 1990-03-05· cited 494×
- Plum Tree, Inc. v. StockmentThird Circuit· 1973-11-30· cited 157×
- Stanley Works v. Globemaster, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 1975-08-12· cited 30×
- Youngman v. Fleet Bank, N.A. (In Re a & P Diversified Technologies Realty, Inc.Third Circuit· 2006-01-19· cited 23×
- Water West, Inc., a Nevada Corporation v. Entek Corporation, a Texas Corporation, and James Edward TurnerNinth Circuit· 1986-04-29· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.