American Universal Insurance Co. v. Joseph Falzone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• instructing the jury that expert report was being admitted only to show the basis of the expert’s opinion and not for the truth of the report
• no error to permit expert to consider “contemporaneous and on-the-scene opinions of other investigators on his team . . . as to [their] portion of the investigation”
• fire marshal’s opinion as to cause of fire based in part upon reports of other investigators; “reasonable for one . . . marshal to rely on the contemporaneous and on-the-scene opinions of other investigators”
• basis testimony may not go to the truth of the matter asserted
• physician's reliance on out-of- court statements, subject to cross-examination, suffices

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).