Skip to main content
· 10/26/1951

American Union Ins. v. Lowman Wine & Bottling Co.

Citations

  • 101 F. Supp. 20
  • 1951 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1963

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that 4 a party’s “perception of the urgency” to obtain relief is insufficient under the ex parte 5 standard
  • denying motion for expedited discovery solely because defendant had not been served with motion and given opportunity to be heard
  • denying motion for expedited discovery solely because defendant had not been served with motion and given opportunity to be heard
  • permitting expedited discovery in trademark infringement lawsuit upon finding good cause
  • a party's mere “perception of the urgency” to obtain 22 relief is insufficient under the ex parte standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duncan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.