American Train Dispatchers Association v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Csx Transportation, Inc., Intervenor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that the exhaustion question should be decided as 27 early as feasible
• taking judicial notice that Bureau of Prisons’ inmate locator available to the public
• taking judicial notice that Bureau of Prisons’ inmate locator available to the public
• after concluding that claim was not procedurally barred, 27 conducting de novo review because state supreme court never reached merits of claim
• “Thus, even assuming that RLEA is not entitled to intervene as of right here, we may allow it to intervene as a discretionary matter. We choose to do so in this case.... ”
• when petitioner does not seek writ of certiorari, one-year limitation period begins to run on when ninety-day period defined by 27 Supreme Court Rule 13 expires

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).