American Safety Insurance Service v. Griggs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an award of damages for unjust enrichment was not supported by competent, substantial evidence where the plaintiffs “only presented evidence of the money they hoped to receive” and did not present evidence of the value of the benefit conferred
• holding that an award of damages for unjust enrichment was not supported by competent, substantial evidence where the plaintiffs “only presented evidence of the money they hoped to receive” and did not present evidence of the value of the benefit conferred
• holding that an award of damages for unjust enrichment was not supported by competent, substantial evidence where the plaintiffs “only presented evidence of the money they hoped to receive” and did not present evidence of the value of the benefit conferred
• stating that compensatory damages under a 10 claim for quasi contract cannot be awarded simply by appealing to the court’s powers in equity and that “an action for unjust enrichment is an action at law, not in equity”
• holding claim for unjust enrichment fails when defendant has given adequate consideration
• reversing where “plaintiffs only presented evidence of the money they hoped to receive under their profit participation agreement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).