American Safety Council, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the public interest will be served by an injunction by preserving the integrity of the procurement process”
• holding that “the public interest will be served by an injunction by preserving the integrity of the procurement process”
• holding that “the public interest will be served by an injunction by preserving the integrity of the procurement process”
• holding that “the public interest will be served by an injunction by preserving the integrity of the procurement process”
• noting that receipt of multiple proposals “undercut^] the argument that the terms are unduly restrictive”
• stating the presence of multiple proposals “undercut[s] the argument that the terms are unduly restrictive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).