American Rivers, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that changes amounting to “some more limited degree of support for” dominant functions “could be held to constitute ‘abandonment’”
• “The Corps’ balancing of water-use interests in the 2004 Master Manual is in accordance with the [Flood Control Act of 1944].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).