American Research Council, Inc. v. Attorney General of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that differential treatment of similarly-situated employees, without some reasonable explanation for the differing treatment, could render a decision arbitrary and capricious
• indicating that ERISA's statutory scheme for damages is complete in itself
• \Plaintiffs can point to no evidence that Cyclops deliberately discriminated against these employees for the purpose of interfering with their rights under the ... Plan\
• “Plaintiffs can point to no evidence that Cyclops deliberately discriminated against these employees for the purpose of interfering with their rights under the ... Plan”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).