Skip to main content
· 3/8/1988

American Remodeling v. Department of Jobs & Training

Citations

  • 419 N.W.2d 842
  • 1988 Minn. App. LEXIS 312

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “the standards of judicial review of agency decisions are essentially the same whether proceeding under the APA or pursuant to our inherent power to review administrative actions”
  • finding an elementary school teacher’s transfer not “arbitrary or capricious” in light of standards found in the enabling statute and relevant regulations
  • finding a determination of whether the APA conferred judicial review on a particular administrative decision irrelevant in light of the courts’ inherent power to review “illegal, unreasonable, arbitrary or capricious administrative action ...”
  • \[T]he standards of judicial review of agency decisions are essentially the same whether proceeding under the APA or pursuant to our inherent power to review administrative actions.\
  • “[T]he standards of judicial review of agency decisions are essentially the same whether proceeding under the APA or pursuant to our inherent power to review administrative actions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Forsberg, Nierengarten, Sedgwick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.