American Reliance Ins. Co. v. PEREZ EX REL. PEREZ

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the same voluntary payments provision precluded coverage where the insured settled a claim without the insurer’s consent
• holding that the same voluntary payments provision precluded coverage where the insured settled a claim without the insurer’s consent
• insured breached insurance contract by entering into settlement with claimant without insurer’s consent while being defended by insurer under reservation of rights
• policy provision prohibiting an insured from voluntarily incurring an expense meant that the insured was required to obtain insurer’s consent before settling and thus insurer had no duty to indemnify insured
• policy provision prohibiting an insured from voluntarily incurring an expense meant that the insured was required to obtain insurer’s consent before settling and thus insurer had no duty to indemnify insured

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).