American Railway Express Co. v. Kristianson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing court’s precedent precluding faulty workmanship from constituting an “occurrence,” finding it “outdated”
• “However, a majority of other states have reached the opposite conclusion [that ■faulty workmanship may constitute an occurrence]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).