American Pure Food Co. v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing that there was two years since the employment relationship had terminated and that was a factor in favor of no fiduciary relationship
• upholding covenant that spanned Dallas County and all adjacent counties for employee with “telephone sales job” based in Dallas County
• “A non-competition covenant ‘must - 12 - bear some relation to the activities of the employee.’”
• “[A] covenant ‘that contains an industry-wide exclusion from subsequent employment is unenforceable.’ ” (quoting Wright, 137 S.W.3d at 298)
• “A non-competition covenant must bear some relation to the activities of the employee.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).