Skip to main content
· 4/8/1988

American Protein Corporation v. Ab Volvo and Volvo Lastvagnar Ab, as Successors in Interest to Beijerinvest Ab, Beijer Industries, Inc. And Bo Lycke

Citations

  • 844 F.2d 56
  • 10 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1165
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 4645

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that factors to consider include lack of normal corporate formality, under-capitalization, and personal use of subsidiary’s funds by the parent or owner
  • noting that there is “a presumption of separateness between a corporation and its owners”
  • the Court emphasized that had there been evidence of these factors, such evidence would have supported piercing the veil
  • “[S]uch domination must have been used to ‘commit fraud or wrong’ against plaintiff, which proximately caused plaintiff’s injury”
  • \the issue of corporate disregard is generally submitted to the jury\
  • “the issue of corporate disregard is generally submitted to the jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Cardamone, Pierce

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.