Skip to main content
· 10/26/1984

American Policyholders' Insurance v. Kyes

Citations

  • 483 A.2d 337
  • 1984 Me. LEXIS 814

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that simultaneous judgment appropriate because insureds waived right to object to it, but expressly declining to expand list of “appropriate instances” for such judgments set forth in Cumberland Cold Storage
  • determining that the court correctly deemed unambiguous the language of a policy that 9 provided coverage for an “insured, ‘but only with respect to conduct of a business’”
  • defendants waived right to a defense by insurer by not objecting to the coverage issue being the focus of the declaratory judgment action and trying the case on the coverage issue
  • no coverage because the \accident was not business-related\
  • finding \conduct ofa business\ unambiguous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKusick, Nichols, Roberts, Violette, Wathen, Glassman, Scolnik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.