Skip to main content
· 5/18/1977

American Policyholders' Insurance Co. v. Cumberland Cold Storage Co.

Citations

  • 373 A.2d 247
  • 1977 Me. LEXIS 476

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the obligation of a liability insurance company to defend an action brought against the insured by a third party is to be determined solely by the allegations contained in the complaint in that action.”
  • simultaneous judgments may be appropriate when case involves such issues as nonpayment of a premium, cancellation of a policy, failure to cooperate, or lack of timely notice
  • “[T]he indemnification obligation depends upon the theory under which judgment is entered in the underlying damage action.”
  • “Courts have frequently observed that the duty to defend is broader than the duty to pay or indemnify”
  • “... the obligation of a liability insurance company to defend an action brought against the insured by a third party is to be determined solely by the allegations contained in the complaint in that action”
  • declaratory judgment may be entered simultaneously as to both the duty to defend and the duty to pay when the case is based on such issues as nonpayment of a premium, cancellation of a policy, failure to cooperate, or lack of timely notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Delahanty, Dufresne, Pomer-Oy, Wernick, Archibald, Dela-Hanty, Godfrey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.