Skip to main content
· 7/17/2012

American Petroleum Institute v. Environmental Protection Agency

Citations

  • 401 U.S. App. D.C. 417
  • 684 F.3d 1342
  • 42 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20157
  • 2012 WL 2894566
  • 74 ERC (BNA) 2153
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 14567

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \The use of the phrase 'should be' rather than 'shall' suggests but does not necessarily mean the Guidelines are not binding.\
  • “No doubt the EPA believes peer review is important and it intended to impress that value upon its staff, but the agency did not bind itself to a judicially enforceable norm.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Ginsburg, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.