· 7/17/2012
American Petroleum Institute v. Environmental Protection Agency
Citations
- 401 U.S. App. D.C. 417
- 684 F.3d 1342
- 42 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20157
- 2012 WL 2894566
- 74 ERC (BNA) 2153
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 14567
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \The use of the phrase 'should be' rather than 'shall' suggests but does not necessarily mean the Guidelines are not binding.\
- “No doubt the EPA believes peer review is important and it intended to impress that value upon its staff, but the agency did not bind itself to a judicially enforceable norm.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edwards, Ginsburg, Rogers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.