Skip to main content
· 2/2/1994

American Petrofina, Inc. v. Allen

Citations

  • 887 S.W.2d 829
  • 37 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 481
  • 1994 Tex. LEXIS 29
  • 1994 WL 27035

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a mere pleading or response to a summary judgment motion does not satisfy the burden of coming forward with sufficient evidence to prevent summary judgment
  • holding that a mere pleading or response to a summary judgment motion does not satisfy the burden of coming forward with sufficient evidence to prevent summary judgment
  • holding that party asserting fraudulent concealment has burden of raising it in response to motion for summary judgment and must come forward with evidence raising - 11 - 04-11-00219-CV fact issue on each element
  • holding that plaintiff’s assertion of fraudulent concealment did not raise a fact issue because “[a] mere pleading or a response to the summary judgment motion does not satisfy this burden of coming forward with sufficient evidence to prevent summary judgment”
  • holding plaintiff had burden to present evidence on each element of fraudulent concealment, which was affirmative defense to defendant’s limitations defense
  • reasoning that omission from amended petition was inadvertent when defendant was added to later-amended petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Doggett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.