Skip to main content
· 8/4/2014

American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association, Inc. v. Sebelius

Citations

  • 62 F. Supp. 3d 114
  • 2014 WL 3817124
  • 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106353

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Proving futility requires demonstrating] that defeat is certain, which the plaintiff cannot demonstrate if its members are succeeding in appeals before the agency.”
  • “As all of [plaintiff]’s claims are substantively based in the Medicare Act, satisfaction of the Act’s conditions regarding judicial review is required.”
  • “Because [plaintiff’s letters] were not tied to any concrete claims, [plaintiffs]’s self-described ‘detailed critiques of the [agency action] . . . [were] insufficient to establish presentment.”
  • “Because [plaintiff’s letters] were not tied to any concrete claims, [plaintiffs]’s self-described ‘detailed critiques of the [agency action] . . . [were] insufficient to establish presentment.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Royce C. Lamberth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.