Skip to main content
· 10/20/1987

American Nickeloid Employee Credit Union v. Pyzska

Citations

  • 162 Ill. App. 3d 84
  • 515 N.E.2d 328
  • 113 Ill. Dec. 519
  • 1987 Ill. App. LEXIS 3344

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting relief allowed “must affect or be affected by the subject-matter of the action” and not “new matter[s] not essential to the determination of that put in litigation by the petition”
  • noting relief allowed “must affect or be affected by the subject-matter of the action” and not “new matter[s] not essential to the determination of that put in litigation by the petition”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heiple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.