American National Property & Casualty Co. v. Lindgren

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• citing, inter alia, Mixon v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Sch., 3:11-cv- 228-MOC-DSC, 2011 WL 5075808, at (W.D.N.C. Aug. 5, 2011
• dismissing Title VII retaliation claim based on email that fails to “claim that Plaintiff is being discriminated against because of her race and/or sex
• “[T]he employee must complain about activity that constitutes unlawful discrimination … rather than about unfair treatment generally.”
• “Nowhere does this email claim that Plaintiff is being discriminated against because of her race and/or sex.”
• “Nowhere does this email claim that Plaintiff is being discriminated against because of her race and/or sex.”
• plaintiff's email complaining to employer did not constitute protected activity where “nowhere” in the email did she “claim that [she] is being discriminated against because of her race and/or sex.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).