American National Fire Insurance v. Esquire Labs of Arizona, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that 26 “evidence on surrounding circumstances, including negotiation, prior understandings, 27 subsequent conduct and the like to determine the parties’ intent . . . may be used to interpret 28 the meaning of the exclusion in the agreement”
• an exclusion for “hair transplant” processes cannot be construed to apply to “hair implant” processes because those terms, as commonly understood, refer to two distinctly different things

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).