Skip to main content
· 4/21/1971

American National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London

Citations

  • 444 F.2d 640

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • union and tugboat employees have standing to allege that tugboat company and competitor union conspiring to provide cheaper labor
  • “[t]he key question” is whether plaintiffs themselves are within the target area, not whether they are “employees” of a business within the target area
  • union had standing to challenge anticompetitive behavior by owners of tugboats attempting to monopolize tugboat industry
  • in order to be cognizable under section 4, the injury must be to commercial interests or enterprises
  • union had standing to challenge anticompetitive behavior by owners of tugboats attempting to monopolize tugboat industry
  • in order to be cognizable under section 4, the injury must be to commercial interests or enterprises

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fairchild

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.