American Mobile Homes of Washington, Inc. v. Seattle-First National Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering the existence of any forum agreement between the parties, the convenience of witnesses, and the general interests of justice because there was not identity of parties
• considering other factors in addition to the identities because the res judicata effect was questionable due to the fact that the parties to the actions were not identical
• “when a state rule is similar to a parallel federal rule we sometimes look to analysis of the federal rule for guidance”
• \when a state rule is similar to a parallel federal rule we sometimes look to 24 analysis of the federal rule for guidance\
• \when a state rule is similar to a parallel federal rule we sometimes look to 24 analysis of the federal rule for guidance\
• the Washington Supreme Court considered equitable factors because the two cases did not involve identical parties or relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).