Skip to main content
· 10/28/1878

American Middlings Purifier Co. v. Vail

Citations

  • 1 F. Cas. 689
  • 15 Blatchf. 315
  • 4 Ban. & A. 1
  • 1878 U.S. App. LEXIS 1599

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that date of filing new action under R.C. 2305.19 relates back to filing date of the preceding action for statute of limitations purposes
  • “Where R.C. 2305.19 applies, the date for filing the new action relates back to the filing date for the preceding action for limitations purposes.”
  • “Where R.C. 2305.19 applies, the date for filing the new action relates back to the filing date for the preceding action for limitations purposes.”
  • “Where the saving statute applies, ‘the date for filing the new action relates back to the filing date for the preceding action for limitations purposes.’ ”
  • “a voluntary dismissal pursuant to Civ.R. 41(A)(1) constitutes failure ‘otherwise than upon the merits’ within the meaning of the savings statute”
  • voluntary dismissal constitutes “failure otherwise than upon the merits” under Ohio’s savings statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blatchford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.