· 10/28/1878
American Middlings Purifier Co. v. Vail
Citations
- 1 F. Cas. 689
- 15 Blatchf. 315
- 4 Ban. & A. 1
- 1878 U.S. App. LEXIS 1599
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that date of filing new action under R.C. 2305.19 relates back to filing date of the preceding action for statute of limitations purposes
- “Where R.C. 2305.19 applies, the date for filing the new action relates back to the filing date for the preceding action for limitations purposes.”
- “Where R.C. 2305.19 applies, the date for filing the new action relates back to the filing date for the preceding action for limitations purposes.”
- “Where the saving statute applies, ‘the date for filing the new action relates back to the filing date for the preceding action for limitations purposes.’ ”
- “a voluntary dismissal pursuant to Civ.R. 41(A)(1) constitutes failure ‘otherwise than upon the merits’ within the meaning of the savings statute”
- voluntary dismissal constitutes “failure otherwise than upon the merits” under Ohio’s savings statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blatchford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.