American Mannex Corp. v. Cronvich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a ban on collective-action waivers in those contracts worked to “disfa- vor[ ] arbitration”
• recognizing that “courts should think hard, and then think hard again, before turning small cases into large ones”
• recognizing that a party who prevails on the bottom line may have enough of a “personal stake” to challenge an adverse ruling the court made along the way
• observing that “our usual adjudicatory rules suggest that a court should forbear resolving this issue”
• specifying that courts must assess the law as of “the time of the challenged conduct”
• explaining that a “longstanding principle of judicial restraint requires that courts avoid reaching constitutional questions in advance of the necessity of deciding them”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).