American Legalnet, Inc. v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering 19 declarations filed in support of a motion for preliminary injunction for purposes of deciding 20 application for early discovery
• denying motion for expedited discovery and explaining that, “in every case, the court has the discretion, in the interests of justice, to prevent excessive or burdensome discovery”
• denying the plaintiffs request for || pre-preliminary injunction discovery because the “plaintiff has not limited its discovery 8 || requests to information to preserve the status quo, as it must’
• explaining the good cause 22 standard a party must show when seeking expedited discovery
• noting Rule 26(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure “generally provides that formal discovery will not commence until after the parties have conferred as required by Rule 26(f)” (internal citations and quotation marks omitted)
• denying expedited discovery in part where 22 discovery sought not narrowly tailored

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).