American Intl. Specialty Lines Ins. Co. v. Allied Capital Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the anti-attachment provision did not apply to VA benefits commingled with other funds
• holding that “prisoners do not have a federally protected liberty interest in having their grievances resolved to their satisfaction”
• “Review of an un-objected legal conclusion from a magistrate [judge] is for plain error.”
• “[A] state actor’s unauthorized deprivation of an inmate’s prison account funds ‘does not constitute a violation of the procedural requirements of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment if a meaningful post-deprivation remedy for the loss is available.’”
• “a state actor’s unauthorized deprivation of an inmate’s prison account funds does not constitute a violation of the procedural requirements of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment if a meaningful post deprivation remedy for the loss is available.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).