American International Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the insurer conducted a reasonable investigation by reviewing the complaint and the insurance policy
• “the insurer who issues a policy for errors and omissions insures against a far different risk than that insured against” under a comprehensive general liability policy
• \the insurer who issues a policy for errors and omissions insures against a far different risk than that insured against\ under a comprehensive general liability policy
• “The evidence showed that [the insurer] reviewed the [third party’s] complaint and the insurance policy. The duty of the insurer may be fully met by such a review.”
• “Damage for lost profits, loss of investment or other harm to one’s economic interest constitute injuries to intangible property which by definition fall outside the scope of the [CGL] policy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).