Skip to main content
· 3/8/2010

American Insurance v. Evercare Co.

Citations

  • 699 F. Supp. 2d 1355
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33381
  • 2010 WL 902571

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the “possibility or conjecture of a future lawsuit” was “sufficient to establish a controversy or a threatened injury”
  • viewing an argument that “the allegations in [the] complaint do not satisfy the case or controversy requirement” as a facial attack to subject-matter jurisdiction
  • “The Declaratory Judgment Act is inappropriate to adjudicate past conduct.”
  • “The Declaratory Judgment Act is inappropriate to adjudicate past conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Timothy C. Batten

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.