· 3/8/2010
American Insurance v. Evercare Co.
Citations
- 699 F. Supp. 2d 1355
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33381
- 2010 WL 902571
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the “possibility or conjecture of a future lawsuit” was “sufficient to establish a controversy or a threatened injury”
- viewing an argument that “the allegations in [the] complaint do not satisfy the case or controversy requirement” as a facial attack to subject-matter jurisdiction
- “The Declaratory Judgment Act is inappropriate to adjudicate past conduct.”
- “The Declaratory Judgment Act is inappropriate to adjudicate past conduct.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Timothy C. Batten
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.