American Insurance Co. v. Midwest Motor Express, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• implying application of the presumption would be proper where “[the plaintiff’s] credit specialist testified statements of premium adjustments in the usual course of business would be sent to the insured”
• finding the trial court correctly held the discovery rule did not prevent the statute of limitations from running, when the party should have discovered its counterclaim more than six years before filing the claim under N.D.C.C. § 28-01-16

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).