American Immigration Lawyers Association,appellants v. Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States,appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the 60–day requirement is jurisdictional rather than a 16 traditional limitations period”
• holding that, because the challenged regulation was “effective April 1, 1997,” a challenge to that regulation “had to be filed no later than sixty days after April 1”
• holding that “the 60-day requirement is jurisdictional rather than a traditional limitations period”
• holding that “the 60–day requirement is jurisdictional rather than a traditional limitations period”
• holding that “the 60-day requirement is jurisdictional rather than a traditional limitations period”
• noting that § 1252(e) contains a “ban on class actions” while § 1252(f)(1) contains a different limitation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).