American Immigration Lawyers Ass'n v. Reno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the 60–day requirement is jurisdictional rather than a traditional limitations period”
• holding that the sixty days runs from a fixed point, rather than “from the date of application of [the challenged procedures] to a particular alien,” such that when an alien’s claims arise is irrelevant
• holding that “unwritten” policies are unreviewable
• “Because IIRIRA is silent as to the nature of any required notice and rebuttal opportunity, the Court must defer to the Attorney General’s determination as to what procedures are appropriate, so long as that determination is reasonable.”
• describing prior system for removal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).