American Honda Motor Co. v. Motorcycle Information Network, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• citing, in part, Bowleg v. Bowe, 502 So.2d 71, 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (per curiam)
• finding FDUTPA claim survives motion to dismiss where it contains “material distinctions” from FUTSA claim
• dismissing a counterclaim’s unjust enrichment claim where it was “predicated on the same set of allegations supporting their claims under [the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act]”
• “Constructive fraud will not lie where the parties are dealing at arms length because there is no duty imposed on either party to protect or benefit the other.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).