American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. Allen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court’s refusal to conclusively determine, before certifying a class, whether the “expert report was reliable enough to support Plaintiffs’ class certification request” was an abuse of discretion
• holding that the district court's refusal to conclusively determine, before certifying a class, whether the \expert report was reliable enough to support Plaintiffs' class certification request\ was an abuse of discretion
• explaining that the court need not rule on a Daubert challenge “if the court decides the motion for class certification on grounds not addressed by the witness”
• holding “that when an expert's report or testimony is critical to class certification, . . . a district court must conclusively rule on any challenge to the expert's qualifications or submissions prior to ruling on a class certification motion”
• requiring a district court to rule on challenges to an expert’s qualifications if the expert's report is “critical to class certification”
• requiring a district court to rule on challenges to an expert’s qualifications if the expert’s report is “critical to class certification”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).